π The Economics of Making Iron
A look at the economics of iron making processes for the transition into Green Iron Making
John Ganser
8/29/20251 min read


π The Economics of Making Iron
After diving into iron ore value chains, I've analyzed several different pathways from raw ore to molten iron.
Key Findings:
π Most Cost-Effective Routes:
Fluidised Bed DRI β EAF: $300/t
Direct Smelting (HIsmelt/Corex): $315/t
DRI Shaft β EAF: $320/t
Traditional BF + Lump Ore: $340/t
π‘ Major Insights:
β
EAF-based routes dominate the cost-efficient end - 5 of the top 6 routes use electric arc furnaces
β
Lump ore still wins - saves $15/t vs pelletized fines in blast furnace operations
β
Integration matters - Direct hot metal production beats pig iron remelting by $100+/t
β
Technology evolution - Newer DRI processes are becoming cost-competitive with traditional blast furnaces
The Surprising Winner? π₯
Fluidised bed DRI edges out even direct smelting! No pelletizing required, direct fines feed, and lower total processing costs.
But here's the reality check: while emerging technologies show promise on paper, the traditional BF + lump ore route at $340/t still powers most of the world's steel production for good reason - proven scale, reliability, and massive throughput capacity.
Strategic Takeaways:
πΈ Raw material selection has major cost implications
πΈ Process integration captures more value than individual optimizations
πΈTechnology choice depends on scale, geography, and risk tolerance
πΈ Energy costs drive 50-60% of total ironmaking economics
The iron and steel industry is at an inflection point. While traditional routes remain dominant, the economics increasingly favor cleaner, more flexible technologies - especially as carbon pricing and ESG factors gain prominence..